翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ World heavyweight championship
・ World Heavyweight Championship (National Wrestling Association)
・ World Heavyweight Championship (Omaha)
・ World Heavyweight Championship (Pacific Northwest)
・ World Heavyweight Championship (WWE)
・ World Heavyweight Championship (Zero1)
・ World Heavyweight Wrestling Championship (Original version)
・ World Hello Day
・ World Hepatitis Day
・ World Hereford Council
・ World Heritage Centre
・ World Heritage Channel
・ World Heritage Committee
・ World Heritage Earthen Architecture Programme
・ World Heritage Memory Net
World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983
・ World Heritage Rock Art Centre - Alta Museum
・ World Heritage Site
・ World Heritage Sites in Norway
・ World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka
・ World Heritage Sites of the Routes of Santiago de Compostela in France
・ World Heroes
・ World Heroes (video game)
・ World Heroes 2
・ World Heroes 2 Jet
・ World Heroes Anthology
・ World Heroes Perfect
・ World Highland Games Championships
・ World Highwire Championships
・ World Hijab Day


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 : ウィキペディア英語版
World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983

The ''World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983'' was an Act of the Parliament of Australia which provided for certain protections for World Heritage listed places.
The validity of the Act was considered by the High Court of Australia in ''Commonwealth v Tasmania'', also known as the Tasmanian Dams case. That case found several provisions of the Act to be invalid, but most of its major provisions were held to be valid.
The Act was repealed in 1999, and replaced by parts of the ''Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999''.
==History==

The ''World Heritage Properties Conservation Bill'' was introduced on 21 April 1983, by the then Minister for Home Affairs and the Environment, Barry Cohen.〔

The Tasmanian Dams case (1983) revolved around the validity of the Act. The High Court of Australia was asked separate questions about the validity of:
# sections 6 and 9,
# sections 7 and 10,
# sections 8 and 11, and
# section 17.〔''Commonwealth v Tasmania'' 〕
On the first part of question, the court held that s 6(1), (2)(b) and (3) were valid, but that it was not necessary to determine the validity of the other subsections.〔 It held that s 9(1)(h) was valid, but that the remaining subsections of s 9(1) and (2) were invalid.〔 On the second part of the question, the court found that s 7 was valid, and that s 10(1) and (4) were valid (the other parts of s 10 being unnecessary to consider).〔 On the third part of the question, the court held both s 8 and s 11 invalid.〔 It held that it was not necessary to answer the fourth part.〔
The Act was repealed in 1999 by Schedule 6 of the ''Environmental Reform (Consequential Provisions) Act 1999'', as part of the reforms that saw the introduction of the ''Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999'', which replaced several prior pieces of environmental legislation.〔''Environmental Reform (Consequential Provisions) Act 1999'' (Sch 6 ).〕 It ceased to have effect on 16 July 2000.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.